I got a new job and I was in training last week and it was kicking my behind. I was tired and worn out. Blog day will have to be Tuesday for the foreseeable future, because now I work all day Thursday.
We have three from last week and one this week.
Little Women
You might say the Little Women have come back to the future.
Lea Thompson is the only name actress here, and she stars in exactly zero movies you remember except three: the Back to the Future trilogy. She's Marty's girlfriend in that and Marmy in this.
Personally, I'm a fan of the 1994 version, but this one looks very faithful to the book. It's set in 2018, which is obviously a big departure. But it looks to me like the spirit of the book is very intact. I have no objection. In fact, I have reason to support this new version.
Greta Gerwig is making her own version of Little Women, due out next year. If you only see one version between these two - please, make it this one. I don't know what horrors Ms. Gerwig has in store, but they can't be good. She is also likely on the warpath, since her last movie had the distinction of being the best-reviewed movie ever on Rotten Tomatoes . . . until it lost that distinction when it got a single negative review counted and lost its candidacy.
There are many movies with 100% on Rotten Tomatoes, but her film, Lady Bird, became the film at 100% with the most reviews counted, beating out Toy Story 2, which held the honor for almost twenty years. When Lady Bird fell off the list, Paddington 2 soared right to the top and is the current placeholder to this day. It was odd for two movies only a few months apart to top such a long-held record back to back like that.
Anyway, Greta Gerwig is known for a genre known as mumblecore. You read that right. It's a "genre" distinguished by its use of non-professional actors and actresses (to get that "raw" performance), and usually including much improvisation, resulting from many long takes of freeform performance. In other words, mumblecore is a genre of bad films.
Moving on.
I have been known to put on Little Women by myself. So I have a genuine vested interest here.
Little Women is rated PG-13 for some thematic elements and teen drinking.
Night School
Could anyone have come up with a less inspired poster?
I'm just gonna be straight with you, it looks really lame. There's not even anything else to say. In three weeks nobody will remember this movie ever existed.
Night School is rated PG-13 for crude and sexual content throughout, language, some drug references and violence.
Smallfoot
LeBron James is in this movie.
Smallfoot is a funny concept. All the bigfoot monsters don't believe humans exist. Some of the conspiracy theory type bigfoot monsters do, but the rest believe it's a myth.
The movie actually looks pretty funny and pretty well-made. If I had kids I might take them.
Smallfoot is rated PG for some action, rude humor, and thematic elements.
Venom
I just don't know.
Tom Hardy hardly ever has bad roles, but this just seems like a flawed idea. I could be wrong. I just don't know.
Venom is a super villain associated with Spider-Man. Sony has toyed with the idea of a Venom movie since way back in 2013 at least. But he's a super villain. What do you do with just a villain? I'm not sure. And I don't know if I care enough to find out.
Venom is rated PG-13 for intense sequences of sci-fi violence and action, and for language.
Some fanboys think a proper Venom movie should be rated R. These would be the same people who complained that the first two Wolverine movies were PG-13. As for me? I'm not sure there is such a thing as a proper Venom movie.
Big Shot Critic